Art as a dialog process
Art in the field of tension of globalization
Why does art as a school subject have to fight for its place in Europe’s education systems? We are talking about a phenomenon that is not only noticeable in Germany, but in all EU member states due to a lack of acceptance and shrinking shares of education.
1
According to the OECD and the European Commission’s assessment, which was made as part of the PISA study with far-reaching consequences for the educational practice of the countries, art does not have the same significance for the successful participation of people in modern societies as the core disciplines of mathematics, languages and natural sciences. Today, the demands on the general education of future generations are shaped by the forces of globalization and the economization of all areas of life in society. The general education school subject of art is not exempt from this, which is why I would like to focus in this article on the considerable importance of core topics of artistic education, the teaching of which is indispensable for the success of individuals in modern societies.
Every young person has to demonstrate a wide range of cognitive skills when they enter vocational training. If we look at the focus of current educational reforms and PISA evaluations, this is essentially limited to verbal and analytical skills. If, on the other hand, we look at the demands of companies, associations and foundations in our economy, creative, visual-communicative, intercultural and social skills and abilities are equally valued when starting a career. Many consider innovative thinking to be an indicator of the future viability of our economy and a core requirement for the direction of education policy.
2
The shift of curricular components in favor of languages, mathematics and natural sciences is therefore not only distancing itself from the goals of humanistic education for the holistic development of the personality, but also from the requirements of our economy.
Companies are looking for employees with strong personalities who can recognize complex issues, unresolved problems or opportunities for future developments. They have to understand complex processes, often visualize them and communicate them to other employees or customers, which requires methodological skills such as ‘design thinking’, a well-trained vivid imagination and modern media presentation skills. ‘Designer thinking’ is strategic innovation thinking and a creative form of teamwork that promotes the targeted search for new sustainable product ideas and corporate strategies. According to the requirements of our labor market, people should be highly team-oriented, creative and able to take criticism. Last but not least, in a global market they need great social sensitivity and a knowledge-based understanding of intercultural contexts. According to the latest brain research, these cognitive abilities must be developed at the earliest possible stages of personality development in order to enable systematic support at a later stage. If young people do not gain creative access to the intellectual and material culture of modern societies during their general education phase, they will not be able to succeed in many future-relevant training courses, degree programs and work processes.
It is not only the bourgeois elites rooted in the Western tradition, but all individuals in our society who participate in cultural techniques through the arts that enable them to participate critically, independently and productively in the socio-cultural achievements of modern societies. Where is the educational equality, the equal opportunities? What will happen to the growing challenges of inclusion and integration if people who are less educated and immigrants in particular are unable to access European cultural practices, theories and values? What creates more respect for the creative potential of people with a migration background, who already make up more than 20% of the German population, than the artistic exploration of the diverse cultures of our world?3
In order to overcome the huge challenges of integration, educational mobility and educational equality in our country, we need a holistic approach to education in the arts that is relevant to everyday life, which can be taught in the classroom and put to the test in social practice.
4
In turn, art didactics must react to the new requirements and initiate a comprehensive reform of the subject in which both traditionally proven and new digital cultural techniques find their place. The subject of art therefore needs not less, but significantly more teaching time, which must be negotiated on the basis of factual arguments with all those involved in the educational process!
In my opinion, we must enable every young person to consciously perceive the cultural achievements of modern societies, to select and classify them according to their relevance for the present, to reflect critically, to present them convincingly and comprehensibly, to preserve them responsibly and to shape them in a future-oriented and creative way. The democratic form of shaping modern societies is based on the possibility for all citizens to participate in a critical dialog process, which must be conducted in all areas of social activity using verbal and descriptive communication techniques on the basis of comprehensive intercultural education. Without intercultural education, it will be impossible in the age of globalization and migration to preserve a common idea of freedom and human dignity in the spirit of the Enlightenment.
Creativity as a central task of art didactics
In my opinion, there are two further core arguments for the urgency of upgrading, expanding and reorienting the subject of art, which I would like to briefly outline in this section. The constantly growing fields of the ‘cultural and creative industries’ form the fastest growing sector of the global economy. Today, creativity is one of the key skills of well-educated people in almost all professional fields, as many solutions to problems cannot be found using analytical methods alone. Even before embarking on a professional qualification, every individual must learn to critically scrutinize facts and routines, to pursue unknown solutions even at the risk of failure and to assert the positions they have found in discursive processes.
We need new solutions for the unsolved problems of the present, innovative products and creative people in all future-relevant professional fields, especially in the STEM qualifications of mathematics, information technology, natural sciences and technology. Everyone is creative, but, like the ability to think logically, creative potential can only unfold with explicit encouragement. The methodical promotion of the ‘core competence of creativity’ should be developed into a central task of art didactics. Creativity techniques and methods of their application could be taught both subject-specifically and interdisciplinary in their significance for art, language and science.
Not everyone becomes a designer, even if the market share of the cultural and creative industries is constantly growing and today makes a significant contribution to the overall economy of modern societies. In Germany alone, more than 249,000 companies employing around 1.59 million people generate more than 145 billion euros through the creative design of cultural spaces. The gross value added of the cultural and creative industries is therefore already higher than the figures for the chemical and energy industries. It takes a closer look at the economic importance of mechanical engineering and the automotive industry, which owe their outstanding position on the global market not least to the creativity of their employees. The figures for the cultural and creative industries do not even include the creative minds in industry who, together with the scientific and technological specialists, make the global success of modern products and services possible. Creativity characterizes the search for the products, production methods, buildings, infrastructures, services and communication technologies of the future, a competition that determines the success of an economy and the prosperity of society worldwide.
The cultural and creative industries are made up of various core areas whose employment figures are subject to varying degrees of dynamic development. The software and games industry, the press market, the advertising market and the design industry are followed by the architecture market, the book market, the film industry and the music industry in the midfield. The broadcasting industry, the performing arts market and the art market follow at the back of the field. Of course, these statistics say nothing about the quality of creative output. But who can say with certainty today that creative creations from graphics, painting and sculpture will have greater cultural-historical relevance for future generations than cities, buildings, furniture, clothing, print media, photos, films, cars, airplanes, computers, smartphones or programs? In addition, the commissioned work occupies a central position in the liberal arts, where the ideas of the client, competition commissions, collectors or gallery owners can provide a framework comparable to that of applied art.
Art didactics can teach young people a critical and constructive attitude towards the effects of global consumption mechanisms if it shows how we can use our creativity to use the world’s limited resources responsibly. ‘Design thinking’ and ‘design ethics’ belong together when creative strategies are taught in art lessons, even if the latter is still an almost undiscovered field of research in Germany.
The educational potential of art as a school subject
The great educational potential of art as a subject lies in the diversity of aesthetic and cultural practices and their interconnectedness with all other fields of thought and action in modern societies. The visual, performing and applied arts are all relevant here, as works of art, design objects and buildings educate, represent and utilize in equal measure. The exhibition or collection of a work of art creates a purpose in the same way as living in a house or producing a commodity. Proof of this is provided by the impressive collections of cultural history museums from all over the world, in which there is hardly a work of art on display for which no purpose can be specified. Art includes all fields of artistic design, from sculpture, painting, drawing and graphics to arts and crafts, design, theater, dance, film, architecture, urban planning and media design. Today, all areas of modern society are so complex that successful and meaningful participation is only possible if the individual has acquired a basic understanding of the diverse codes of the cultural space.
It is therefore becoming increasingly urgent for art lessons to deal with the outstanding works of all design disciplines, in particular with their significance in terms of the history of ideas, technology, social, economic and communicative aspects. The traditional core area of ‘fine arts’ is formed by disciplines such as sculpture, drawing, painting and graphics, arts and crafts and architecture, which are practiced today in both free and applied forms. In addition, there are other historically evolved cultural practices such as the textile arts, book art, jewelry art, but also new time-based arts such as film, video, performance, media art, conceptual art or scenic writing, which are symbiotically linked to ‘performing arts’ such as drama, theater and dance. The disciplines of architecture, interior design, landscape architecture, urban planning, conservation and restoration as well as building conservation and monument preservation have emerged from the art of building.
Modernity, driven by increasing industrialization, has displaced many old trades and marginalized the arts and crafts, while hundreds of new professions have been created in the planning, conceptual and technical fields. Craft professions and creative vocational training include such diverse activities as product designer, visual marketing designer, media designer, photographer, glass designer, interior decorator, goldsmith, ceramist, painter and varnisher, stonemason, bricklayer, restorer or gilder. On the other hand, there are design courses such as industrial design, ceramic and glass design, game and learning design, audiovisual design, communication design, fashion design, textile design, stage design, costume design, multimedia design, VR design and game design. The focus of design courses is on complex design, while the craft teaches skills for practical implementation. Art lessons should draw on both fields of practice, i.e. teach creative idea production and practices for their implementation. Today we can plan a lot, but never everything in advance, which is why every complex design task, such as the production of buildings, films or productions, is dependent on the cooperation of everyone involved in the work. In a complex communicative process, complete works of art are created in which a large number of participants with different tasks, methods and content have to work together as a team. The skills and abilities for complex design are a key competence that can be taught nowhere better than in the school subject of art.
With the digitalization of modern societies, a large number of media professions have emerged in which the ‘design of communication’ is practiced and theoretically reflected upon. Study programs such as Print and Media Technology, Media Informatics, Mobile Media, Online Media Management, Media Economics, Media Publishing, Information Design, Advertising and Market Communication, Computer Science and Media, Crossmedia Publishing & Management, Media Management or Corporate Communication are based on fundamental skills and abilities for visual communication, aesthetic perception, artistic imagination and presentation skills in writing and images. The theoretical field of reflection, organization, evaluation and mediation of artistic practice ranges from art history and art education to new fields of activity such as art management, art and cultural mediation or cultural journalism.
Art teaching can benefit greatly from the diverse professional fields of action of creative disciplines if practices and theories from different disciplines are selected according to criteria such as socio-cultural relevance, exemplarity and diversity and taught in teacher training courses. The many paths to art and the understanding of art show that and how we can preserve and renew our material and spiritual culture in all design disciplines. Works of art from all creative fields are the archive of cultural tradition, cultural education and a model for new cultural creations. They shape our self-image, our sense of community and our identity. Their methods are always highly relevant, highly productive and the driving force behind our cultural progress.
Consequences for teacher training and teaching art in schools
Contemporary art teaching must represent the unity of all the arts in such a way that a cross-section of the design courses at our colleges, universities and art academies is represented. As a university lecturer myself, I witnessed the controversial discussion process at Burg Giebichenstein University of Art and Design Halle, which went hand in hand with the renaming of the title. In the end, it was clear that both faculties no longer wanted to be perceived as a ‘university of art and design’, but rather as a unified university of art. The liberal and applied arts are united under the umbrella of an art academy, which promotes mutual awareness and creative dialog in theory and practice.
This approach can only be realized with a reform of teacher training, as a result of which far more practical disciplines than before should be given space. The art teacher training program includes not only graphic art, painting and sculpture, but also contemporary fields of practice in design, architecture and arts and crafts. In addition, there is a need to expand all interdisciplinary teaching areas such as design fundamentals, creativity, manual and digital presentation methods, the psychology of perception, art history, cultural sociology, cultural philosophy, cultural economics and artistic research.
This principle must be defined and regularly updated by those responsible in the subject sciences, subject didactics and education policy with the involvement of teachers. Any other selection principle must deal with the accusation of arbitrariness, which is ultimately the reason for the lack of social acceptance. In my opinion, this is above all a question of political will, which must remedy the structural deficits in teacher training as quickly as possible so that the subject of art can meet the demands of modern societies.
Art teaching can only meet the diverse demands of modern societies if the necessary conditions are created at the university, art academy and school. The current division of the teacher training course in art into 1/3 educational sciences, 1/3 first subject and 1/3 second subject is a historical relic that no longer does justice to the complexity of the theoretical and practical field. As a result, all teachers of art as a school subject are permanently overburdened and are no longer able to adequately teach many of the important contents of today’s curricula, such as design with digital media or an introduction to architecture and design. It is not enough for us to adapt the curricula of art as a school subject to the requirements of modern societies, we must also create teaching skills and space for this in teacher training! This would also significantly increase the social acceptance of all art teachers. Teacher training in art requires the full subject so that the content and skills described here, which are often already mandatory in curricula, can be taught on a didactic and practical basis. In my opinion, school art lessons need the same amount of time as German right from the start, with blocks of whole days and project weeks. I will explain why I use German as a reference in the next section.
Visual communication as a central task of art didactics
In addition to creativity, every individual needs basic skills and abilities for ‘visual communication’ at school and at work. This descriptive form of human language includes many other didactic approaches such as ‘visual literacy’ or ‘image literacy’. In my opinion, the extremely problematic reduction of the content and methods of visual communication to the aspects of agitation, propaganda, advertising and marketing obstructs the path of conveying aesthetic cultural education in the sense of vivid linguistic competence. Visual and verbal language are together at the center of all experience formation, information design and knowledge transfer, which is why we must understand and teach visual communication skills and abilities analogous to the native language.
All the terms in our vocabulary remain empty and meaningless if we do not associate any vivid ideas with them. Visual communication includes the development of visual perception skills, imagination and a variety of manual and digital representation skills. Visual perception is a comprehension ability that is comparable to listening or reading word language. A viewer makes sense and meaning of the world of appearances through active interpretation, which only then confronts him in the form of images, objects or spaces. The vivid imagination, in turn, is based on a repertoire of pictorial objects and their meaningful relationships, which we have to acquire through active forms of appropriation, analogous to the repertoire of our verbal language.
Reading and interpreting are equally the most important forms of our imagination, thinking and creation. The multitude of vivid illustration skills serve us not only to illustrate words and texts! Graphics, images and pictorial narratives are a language of their own, the knowledge of which is indispensable in theory and application practice for visualizing information, imparting knowledge and creating orientation. We construct cities, buildings and objects, create images, sculptures and films that also teach us how to read and use them. The entire cultural space functions like a descriptive archive of socio-cultural practices and theories if we have learned to interpret and use it in this way.
Verbal and visual communication skills and abilities are therefore a prerequisite for successful and responsible participation in modern media societies. The visual form of language and media competence is a core area of art, which is why pupils in the school subject of art must learn to read and write vividly from the outset, and even more so than before, which also goes hand in hand with the teaching of aesthetic, cultural and ethical values. Everyone should learn to present simple and complex facts and processes clearly! The mediation process should begin with analog media such as sketching, drawing, graphics, collage, models, painting, dance and theater, and later be continued in combination with digital media such as photography, film, animation, print media, app and web design.
The descriptive form of perception, abstraction, organization, presentation and communication of information forms a core component of modern knowledge societies. The constantly growing importance of interactive media such as websites, applications and Internet platforms not only serves to convey information, but also generates completely new social practices, economic flows of goods and cultural activities. Acquiring the skills and abilities to interpret and illustrate complex findings in the form of sketches, drawings, illustrations, photographs, films, process graphics, functional diagrams, infographics, animations and interactive applications is part of everyone’s general education today! The prerequisite for participating in the shaping of modern societies can only be acquired through a comprehensive educational process due to the large scope and high degree of complexity.
The design of the cultural space reflects the dialog process between people and the environment, as each generation learns through observation, asks its own questions and searches for contemporary answers to solve individual and social problems. Looking at a work of art can be just as educational as reading a book if we can correctly interpret the complexity of the message, critically assess its value and express our resonance in both visual and verbal form.
To make it even clearer what I’m getting at in this article, I’d like to play a little mind game with you. What do you think of this argument for the general education subject of art: “Art lessons make a significant contribution to the visual, artistic and media-based education of pupils. It familiarizes them with the forms of descriptive communication and art as a means of understanding the world and conveying reality, of interpersonal communication, analysis and reflection, but also of problem-solving and creative design.”
If you google this short text, you will find it with a few changes under “Key ideas for skills acquisition, central tasks of the subject German”.
5
I have only replaced the five words in bold, which demonstrate the connection and difference between the two primary forms of communication of human perception, imagination and creation: “German lessons make a significant contribution to pupils’ linguistic, literary and media education. It familiarizes them with language and literature as a means of understanding the world and communicating reality, of interpersonal communication, of analysis and reflection, but also of problem-solving and creative design.”
There are subject-specific peculiarities in the verbal and descriptive form of our language competence, especially with regard to history, repertoire, methods, media and techniques. More important, however, are the similarities, as our imagination, thinking and actions are only revealed by our abilities and skills to verbalize and illustrate complex ideas and processes. In addition, it is skills in words and images that will determine the future of “digital societies”.
Art is omnipresent and concerns us all
Parents often say things like this: “Why does my child need art, he’s not supposed to be a painter!” The child is probably not supposed to become a mathematician, writer or physicist either, but similar to politics and educational science, most parents also rate the benefits of these school subjects for general education much higher. This fact is particularly problematic for the acceptance of art as a school subject, as parents’ assessments are very quickly transferred to the children’s appreciation, commitment and learning success.
Today, art is seen in large parts of society as a leisure activity for the bourgeois elite, which creates an existential problem for the school subject of the same name. The formative function of visual perception in everyday life or self-initiated aesthetic learning processes such as shaping one’s own identity in social networks are far too rarely regarded as artistic processes by teachers and pupils alike. Most pupils spend far more time on these informal learning processes and are much more committed to their work than they are to many tasks in art lessons. Even many progressive approaches to the expansion and renewal of art practice, such as Pop Art or Action Art, are nowadays communicated conventionally in museum form and understood less as living reminders of the need for a constant revolution in the art world. The established reception of art, which is rejected by large sections of the population, can be found in the cultural section of bourgeois newspapers or cultural programs, which can be seen far away from the main viewing times. Interest in art and culture programs, such as the recognized art and culture scene, is shown by 4-6% of the population, although these figures do not reflect curiosity about contemporary art, but interest in art and culture in general.6
We must take note of these figures, as they say nothing about the cultural value of contemporary art, but they do say something about its appreciation among large sections of the population. In the mass media, the concept of art merges with the elitist structures of the art market, where the name and market value of the artist shape the contemporary meaning of most works of art. Collecting art promises membership of an elite club.
7
In the eyes of many people, outstanding art is defined by its price, a serious misjudgement that says a lot about society but undermines the acceptance of the subject in large sections of society. In the logic of the art market, art history also becomes a style-forming show of superstars whose works we consume and whose biographies we admire. This obscures the view of the many creative artists of the present who produce the wealth of ideas of modern societies undetected and who live among us in everyday, often precarious situations. Let’s go on a search!
The significance of art for modern societies stands and falls with the definition of the term, which is why I would like to argue for an expanded concept of art based on my experience in didactics, theory and practice of design. Scientists identify themselves with their knowledge and consequently call themselves biologists, physicists, philosophers or sociologists. Artists should identify themselves with their skills and describe themselves as painters, draughtsmen, directors and architects. It is just as paradoxical to distinguish between an artist and a designer as it is to distinguish between a scientist and a chemist. Of course, we can have several forms of expression and create works in different disciplines; this is also often the case in the sciences and leads to an enumeration and weighting of professions. While the content and methods of the subject discipline are taught in the science teacher training courses, prospective art teachers have to deal with an immensely larger theoretical and practical field. The school subject of art needs to be reduced to the essentials, the goals of any general education, the intellectual, ethical and aesthetic shaping of the personality.
Perhaps the path to contemporary art didactics begins with a brief return to the beginnings of art teaching, as the introduction of a new school subject requires a high degree of acceptance within society. The foundation of art as a general education subject is rooted in the didactic potential of drawing. While we open up the ‘paths to science’ via reading and writing, we can open up the ‘paths to art’ in a methodically comparable way via drawing, insofar as this involves the formation of our visual perceptual ability. Drawing is still the basis of all the arts today, if we understand and convey it as a descriptive form of our language. Drawing is one of the most important cultural techniques of mankind alongside word language, as it begins with the recording of phenomena, continues with the discovery of our world of symbols and reaches the greatest complexity through the visualization of knowledge and stories, ideas and concepts as well as constructions and manufacturing processes. Our drawing techniques and illustration tools have developed and diversified extremely quickly over the last hundred years. Drawing is done in every artistic discipline, whether with pencil, brush, model, body, camera or computer interface. Many people can express their perceptions and ideas better through drawing skills than through the means of verbal language. The didactics of drawing thus opens up new ways for more effective inclusion and integration. Everyone should learn to draw, sketch or construct abstractly and concretely, to improvise or work purposefully, to draw freely from the imagination or precisely reproduce a template in order to visualize their own ideas, concepts and processes.
In the world of work, the learning process continues in the applied drawing techniques, which in a broad sense cover all professional fields. In my professional career as a stonemason, I had to learn to draw sculptural forms in the material with a hammer and chisel. As an architect, I learned to sketch ideas and concepts, to graphically visualize imaginative spaces and to technically draw instructions for a variety of project participants. As a media artist, I have experienced how light can be used to move people emotionally, change their perception and open up new perspectives on familiar environments. Finally, as a university lecturer, author, speaker, conference leader and artistic director of major exhibition projects, I have to outline my ideas for experts and laypeople on an almost daily basis, using a variety of media and visualization techniques. Each drawing technique has its own aesthetics, its technical and material limitations, its potential for expression in terms of content and form, and its media-specific design methodology. In many places, art teaching practice has already begun to recognize and use the methodological potential of drawing in its practical, media-specific forms.
Everyone is an artist as soon as we become aware of it
Aesthetics is a project of the Enlightenment. Its founder, Alexander Baumgarten, saw it as the vivid form of our cognitive approach to the world. According to Immanuel Kant, the enlightened person should escape their self-inflicted immaturity by finding the courage to use their intellect without the guidance of another. Thanks to the almost unlimited possibilities of reproduction and media presence, art has become a common good. All people are at least potential artists who can achieve maturity and the all-round development of their talents through their own creative self-activity and the formation of their perception. Art and science are the two fundamental forms of our access to the world. This is precisely the root of art didactics. Art is omnipresent! Art concerns us all! Art is where people are creatively active, where artistic means are used in the artistic process! What remains of the artistic process can be seen in the cultural education of the individual as well as in the work, the aesthetic manifestation of an endless search that constantly raises new questions, challenges new answers and stimulates new creative design processes. The aesthetic examination of the appearance of the everyday world is just as much a part of art lessons as knowledge of the outstanding works of cultural history. By revealing the history of ideas, the works of the past become relevant for understanding and shaping the present.
Everyone engages in some form of art reception in their everyday lives if we consider our engagement with the entirety of our material and intellectual culture, including arts and crafts, design and architecture. A look at the museum landscape and its visitor numbers shows that the reception of art practiced under the expanded concept of art already represents an important educational factor in modern societies.7 More than 110 million museum visits are registered each year in Germany alone, where the still rapidly growing number of now more than 6,000 institutions represents the entire cultural landscape, past and present. The public’s interest in museums is focused on the entire material and intellectual culture of mankind, the so-called art museums, such as museums of folklore and local history, natural history, natural science, technology, architecture, applied arts, arts and crafts, film and photography.
In addition to the aura of the original, explanatory images, texts, graphics and films are often used for communication purposes. The power of museums is based on the aesthetic persuasiveness of the exhibits and the vivid form of knowledge transfer, which can be immediately recognized by anyone who is guided through a museum with their eyes closed. Language remains empty of content where we lack visualization. The aesthetic education of our perception, the knowledge of historical contexts and the teaching of cognitive skills for the interpretation of vivid artifacts are core tasks of art teaching. The fact that the current number of hours in art lessons in general education schools leaves little room for this should not be a reason to overlook this educational gap. For whom do we collect, archive, maintain and preserve works of culture? Why do we build so many elaborate houses to exhibit culture, in which we assemble the works in the form of thematic exhibitions and offer them to the public for educational purposes, when hardly anyone has learned to interpret them and make them useful for shaping the present?
The largest illustrative archives of human culture are to be found not only in museums, but also in the settlement areas of societies. We can learn a great deal from contemporary and historical artifacts such as bridges, railroads, buildings, streets, furnishings and everyday objects if we are able to interpret their appearance in the context of their history of ideas and origins. The UNESCO World Heritage Site lists many cities that are preserved as cultural artifacts and visited as educational sites. A city like Venice alone has 30 million visitors a year who benefit informally or deliberately from this synthesis of the arts. It is not the individual artifact, but the sum of all significant cultural achievements in their spatial and temporal context that gives us an understandable picture of society, no matter which part of the world we look at. Who would want to separate the Grand Canal from the buildings and squares of Venice, the facades and interiors of the churches, palaces and town houses, the bridges and means of transportation, the masks, clothing and artefacts? Even more important than the perception of artifacts is the analysis of their position in relation to each other and to the whole, from which invisible social forms and their practices can be reconstructed. The aesthetic approach to world cultural heritage and world natural heritage is not innate to us, as the barbaric acts of cultural and natural destruction at different times and in different places around the world show time and again. All school subjects can provide education. However, appreciation only arises through reflection on one’s own self-perception and perception of the environment and active participation in the creative process, which can be taught nowhere better than in art lessons!
Art is the form in which history takes place! It happens here and now or in other parts of the world that we travel to or access through the media. Art is always topical! Art has an emotional persuasive power that unites, divides, constitutes and changes societies! If you need an example of the topicality and impact of art in the broader sense I have described, take a look at the pictures of drowned refugee children, which have triggered a wave of willingness to help and changed our world for good. The power of images unfolds in the media-effective actions of the terrorist organization ‘Islamic State’, whose hatred and destructive rage is directed against millennia-old temples and the liberal life of European civil societies. The images of the destruction of culture and the restriction of freedom disseminated via the internet generate and unite the resistance of people across all religious boundaries. They form part of our collective visual memory and become a vivid narrative of history. Where do we learn respect for the works of other people and cultures if not through our own art practice, in which we have to fight for every small step towards our own work over great efforts and resistance, which remain in our memories for the rest of our lives. And where could we encounter the feelings and thoughts of foreign peoples and religions more effectively and learn to understand foreigners, migrants and refugees better than by engaging with their culture? Art has an integrative effect when we have learned how productive and enriching encounters with foreign cultural forms have been and can be for societies. So why do I ask once again at the end of my remarks, does the school subject of art have to fight for its place in the education system of modern societies?
The entire text contribution can be found in the publication:
Current positions in art didactics
Martina Ide, Christine Korte-Beuckers, Friedericke Rückert (eds.)
ISBN/EAN: 9783867361538
copaed 2016
[download id=”45″]